Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Ladies Man








FROM PLAYGIRL, OCTOBER 1975

THANKS

18 comments:

  1. Ah, the mark of quality porn - it makes you hot, bothered - and feeling more than just a little bit dirty...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Muscato! Please! We do NOT, repeat, NOT!, post porn on this tres classy and highbrow site. Artistic studies of the male form, yes. Porn, never!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is it wrong that I've had these photos saved somewhere on my computer for 10 years now?
    Never mind...

    ReplyDelete
  4. There's a sophomoric "hard drive" joke waiting to happen, and, no sirree, I'm not taking the bait...

    ReplyDelete
  5. My bad!

    Edit to: "The mark of quality artistic studies..."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Suddenly I'm in the mood for Italian...umm...food, yes that's it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hakim, if I'm not mistaken, no?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes, I believe so... What strikes me is that he still looks remarkably undated, unlike most Playgirl models from the 1970's -- shag for days.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's amazing what I memorize...and what I forget.


    Shag, I never forget.

    ReplyDelete
  10. There's something so sexy about a natural man...I'd take a man like this over a plastic-looking Ken doll any day. That he looks like Andy Garcia is a plus, too. :)

    BTW, I laughed when I saw the word verification...it was "Flondily." I think I'll make up a definition for that and use it frequently.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Jason -- I'd like to memorize every inch of him.

    Scooter -- I concur! And "flondily" sounds like a description of how one would fondle somebody they're fond of.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Eggs come to mind, large grade A.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Tee hee! Yes. But no chicken here!

    ReplyDelete
  14. i know this is a highbrow site. so go to mine for naked men!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I miss the days when a natural bush and body hair were the accepted norm...

    ReplyDelete
  16. Jimmy Hakim indeed. He appeared in a 1975 issue when I was a lad of 21, and his pages and I had many a 'date.'

    ReplyDelete

There was an error in this gadget